Why Cutting DEI Could Put Workplace Safety at Risk

As DEI initiatives face growing political scrutiny, some companies are scaling back their programs—but workplace safety expert Heather Chapman warns that doing so could put workers at greater risk. As Head of Safety and Risk at Soter, Chapman works with companies like IKEA, Coca-Cola, and DHL to integrate AI-driven safety solutions that support diverse workforces. In this Q&A, she explains how eliminating DEI can weaken Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) programs and what companies can do to maintain inclusive safety practices without taking a political stance.

Supply Chain 24/7: You’ve said eliminating DEI can actually make workplaces less safe. Can you explain how safety risks tend to increase when DEI is removed?

Heather Chapman: When DEI initiatives are removed from Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) programs, it can facilitate an environment where marginalized groups feel less empowered to speak up about safety concerns. This gives rise to unreported hazards and overlooked safety risks, especially in industries with large frontline workforces where open communication is crucial. DEI programs help to create an inclusive safety culture where everyone’s voice is valued and their unique perspectives are recognized. When these initiatives are removed, we risk losing valuable insights that could prevent accidents or injuries, ultimately compromising workplace safety for all employees.

SC247: Some companies see DEI as a political issue rather than a safety one. How would you explain the connection between DEI and worker safety to a CEO?

HC: I would emphasize that DEI isn’t just about politics – it’s a fundamental foundation of workplace safety. Diverse teams bring diverse perspectives, which help identify safety risks from multiple angles. Without DEI, critical insights may be missed, leading to increased accidents and injuries on the job. DEI creates a culture of inclusivity, encouraging workers to voice their concerns and engage in